DAY
22
A
LITTLE BIRDY
Exodus 4, 5 & 6 and Matthew 14:22-36
Today I want
to focus on a small, yet what might be a confusing part of the text in Exodus.
The passage from Matthew I touched on yesterday. Today in Exodus 4-6 we have:
Moses continuing to wrestle with God, seemingly at every turn saying, “But what
if…”; God then in response to each turn gives Moses signs and wonders; Moses
gets permission from Jethro (his father-in-law) to go back to Egypt; Aaron
meets up with Moses; they go to Egypt and they begin to engage the Israelites.
Moses all along the way is worrying about whether any of this will work because
the people’s spirit was broken (cf. 6:9).
We will read
more about how God inspires Moses, the people of Israel and hardens Pharaoh’s heart,
and I will comment on those in the coming days, but today I want to focus on a
short and confusing bit of the text: “At a lodging place on the way the
LORD met him and sought to put him to death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin and touched
Moses' feet with it and said, "Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to
me!" So he let him alone. It was then
that she said, "A bridegroom of blood," because of the circumcision.” (from chapter 4:24-26).
I want to focus on this because we might be scratching our
head. The more we skip over parts of the Scripture we do not understand, the
more we can tend to dismiss other parts of God’s Word. So what do I think is
going on here? My remarks come from a teaching of Dr. Douglas Stuart.
If we go “upstream
one verse, to verse 23 we read that God foretells the killing of Egyptian first
born son. This is serious business. The Exodus Story is not just one of many
stories, but it is an extremely important moment.
Does he have
the moral authority to do so?
None of us
by ourselves can claim such. Moses is like all of us, he is flawed and he
fails. We have seen over and over again the flawed nature of the humans doing
God’s work in the Bible. We should not judge them, rather we should see
ourselves and understand God’s using of them means he can and will use us even if we are
reluctant.
Here is
Moses, who is supposed to be in a Covenant Relationship, he is suppose to be the
human leader of those in Covenant with God, and his sons are not circumcised. Circumcision is the sign of the Covenant. It
is interesting to note that he is living with the Midians. We might think that
he was just following their culture by not circumcising his son. We know however that the Midianites
practiced circumcision as well as the Hebrews.
We also know
that Moses father-in-law was a Midianite priest (you might even say a Bishop)
and therefore his wife would know how to perform a circumcision. In fact she
says the “right words”, the words that a mother would say and not the words of
a father.
A few more
details: First the word “feet” is a euphemism for genitals in the language of
the day. Second “Bridegroom of blood” is her saying, “I am married to Moses and
therefore as his one flesh spouse I am doing on his behalf what he has not yet
done.” One last detail, Moses wife’s name actually translates as “bird” or “birdy”.
Here is
Moses on his way to demand Pharaoh obey God and he, Moses, has disobeyed God in
this area. So here is Moses (in a culture that circumcises, and being from a
people who circumcise) having not circumcised his son, the symbol of the
Covenant. We all do this. We all compartmentalize. In some ways we obey God,
and in other ways we do not.
God was willing to put Moses to death. For Moses not to circumcise his son and then demand Pharaoh to obey God would have been a horrendous error. Enter Birdy: this
daughter of a priest, this godly wife, intercedes for Moses. Birdy, who is of one body with Moses, establishes that Moses and his sons are now in full covenant with God. Birdy saves the day!
Which brings
us all back this business of the Exodus and Plagues and being Covenant people;
it is a serious business. We are now that people of the Covenant. God loves us yes, but let us not keep this relationship casually.
David thanks for focusing on that part. I was confused with the wording and you helped clear that up. The language back then was strange and sometimes hard to understand.
ReplyDeleteRuth Martin
Powerful stuff!
ReplyDeleteHi Suzi, I think it is very cool that you are teaching Sunday School!
Delete